BtEO wrote:If you were questioning whether a hand really went up her skirt prior to her assault fine, I guess.
Prior to her assault? The hand was the assault, surely? Unless you know something I don't.
BtEO wrote:That wasn't what you were doing. You were looking for why the guy should have been allowed to put his hand there without expecting reprisals - when such situations are few compared to situations where it is sexual assault.
gravity says she's on a date.
gravity says the guy slips the paw.
It's a pretty common and unremarkable occurrance - and one I'm willing to bet vastly outnumbers sexual assault. So much so that on the limited information given, it's not unreasonable to assume anything beyond petting unless told otherwise. Read like an over-reaction to me. Given, as I say, the paucity of detail.
Noone's looking for excuses for unwanted sexual attention and implications to the contrary are pretty weak. The only thing I've been looking for is clarification. But if it'll untwist your knickers then I'm explicitly stating that in this hugely unlikely situation this notional guy was completely in the wrong.
Maybe you're only doing it because it's Gravity - you're still being arseholes.
Grow up. That's not even worth responding to and adds absolutely nothing beyond dummy-spitting.
sig by baghead.
That's a good size for a Yum-Yum.