just a technicality?,...

mikehendo · Post by **mikehendo** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 5:55 am

technically single could also mean that he isnt married

T8y8 · Post by **T8y8** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 5:59 am

It means he's single, and he's not sure how to answer....

I've used this answer before....

In MY case, I kinda liked the girl, but I liked another more.... I couldn't say I was taken... but I couldn't say I was totally single either....

Daemonfly · Post by **Daemonfly** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:05 am

Probably means he's single enough for a one-nighter

Garr_The_Sane · Post by **Garr_The_Sane** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:09 pm

[quote="Deacon";p="315509"]Maybe he's straight and knows you too well

[/quote]
nah,... i'm 99.99999999% certain he's not straight,..

EvilElf, I never said he resisted me,..

JonnWood · Post by **JonnWood** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:17 pm

[quote="Imperator Severn";p="315557"]

Maybe he's straight and knows you too well

Careful iSev, the thought police will come for you.

Maybe he's gay and knows you too well.[/quote]

Rorschach · Post by **Rorschach** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:19 pm

Maybe he's a chancing bastard who wants his man-cake and to eat it
Tell him to get to fcuk, cute or not

Infin8Cyn · Post by **Infin8Cyn** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 5:23 pm

Maybe that he's Technically single, but not looking to change that status?

SpiderBites · Post by **SpiderBites** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:02 pm

Maybe he worships Star Trek?

Catamaul · Post by **Catamaul** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:13 pm

It means he is married, and in the process of a seperation.

Did he said "I'm technically single" with a wink wink, or a finger pulling his collar away from his neck like he was uncomfortable?

Next time be more direct, like ask him if he wants a good round of the HN, or ask him to clarify when he says it.

Either that or he worships Star Trek.

Garr_The_Sane · Post by **Garr_The_Sane** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:53 pm

Rorschach, well, i'm not looking for a relationship with him or anything,.. he lives too far off anyway,.. but we're going to a furry Con in Germany together in a few months time,.....

Catamaul, I haev asked him directly,.. and he keeps being evasive,. :-\

as for Star Trek,... well I WOULD think that except for the fact WE'RE BOTH FURRIES!!!!!... as furries we get ranked somewhere bellow trekkies,... so I doubt he'd have a problem with beinga trekkie,......

Rorschach · Post by **Rorschach** » Thu Apr 08, 2004 3:27 pm

[quote="Garr_The_Sane";p="316012"]Rorschach, well, i'm not looking for a relationship with him or anything,.. he lives too far off anyway,.. but we're going to a furry Con in Germany together in a few months time,.....[/quote]
Then what's the problem mate?
Just fuck him and leave it at that

Catamaul · Post by **Catamaul** » Thu Apr 08, 2004 3:41 pm

Then what's the problem mate?
Just fuck him and leave it at that

The man with the changing face is correct.

SpiderBites · Post by **SpiderBites** » Thu Apr 08, 2004 4:49 pm

as furries we get ranked somewhere bellow trekkies,... so I doubt he'd have a problem with beinga trekkie,......

I've always placed furries above trekkies on my scale. They seem to horrify me much less.

Trekkies, on the otherhand, are terrifying creatures that crawl from the slime filled depths of the New Jersey coast.

MaverickLlama · Post by **MaverickLlama** » Thu Apr 08, 2004 5:32 pm

*offended*

Now, I usually don't take offence to jibes against my homeland but THAT is just WAY too far.

Dreamer · Post by **Dreamer** » Thu Apr 08, 2004 5:57 pm

Let's use math, Garr.
(1)+(-1)=0
Correct?
We can use this simple equation to figure out exactly what (technically single) means.
Okay, let's try to reach "0" from the answer (technically single). In order to do that, we have to decide what the exact opposite of (technically single) is.
Some would instantly think that the opposite is (un-technically dating). But that would be incorrect. That would be a direct proportion to (technically single) and not what we are looking for. We are looking for something opposite on the XY axis.

So, he is either the opposite of (untechnically single) or (technically dating). For simplicity's sake, let's assume the opposite of (technically single) is (technically dating)
Now our equation can read:
(technically single)-(technically dating)=0
The (technically)s cancel out and we are left with
(single)-(dating)=0
So, now we can say, unequivocally, that he is indeed (single).
Since he is NOT (dating), according to the above equation, as (dating) was a construct used to balance the equation for arguments sake, and not derived from this reallife(tm) situation.

So relax. There's nothing that can't be solved with magik and science.

EDIT: In the interest of fairness, I also decided to carry out the equation using (un-technically single) as the opposite of (technically single). We achieve (technically single)-(un-technically single)=0 Again the (technically)s cancel out and we yield (single)-(un-single)=0 Which means, not only is he (single), he is most definitely not (un-single).

EDIT2: And at the very least, when he refuses to answer next time, you can present this equation to him as proof of his (single)ness. Hell, you're not going to scare him away. I mean... He's a furry. What could possibly scare him away?

Real Life Forums

just a technicality?,...

Who is online