This is from around 12:45 last night. Nothing spectactular, but it is interesting to know about none the less. Actually, I am wondering how and/or why they came to the conclusion that an alien species would most likely transmit on that frequency?Dr Dan Wertheimer, a radio astronomer at the University of California
(Berkeley) and the chief scientist for the project, said: "It is the
most interesting signal from SETI@home. We are not jumping up and
down, but we are continuing to observe it."
Named SHGb02+14a, the possible alien communication has a frequency of
about 1420 megahertz - one of the main frequencies at which hydrogen,
the most common element in the universe, readily absorbs and emits
energy.
Some astronomers have suggested that aliens trying to announce their
presence would be likely to transmit at this frequency, and SETI
researchers regularly scan this part of the radio spectrum.
The unexplained signal appears to be emanating from a point between
the constellations of Pisces and Aries, where there is no obvious star
or planetary system within 1,000 light years, and the transmission is
also very faint.
Dr Eric Korpela, of the research team, said: "We are looking for
something that screams out 'artificial'. This just doesn't do that,
but it could be because it is distant."
So far, the telescope has managed to pick up the signal for only about
a minute in total, which is not sufficient for astronomers to analyse
it fully.
"Strange" SETI@Home Signal.
Forum rules
1) Remain civil. Respect others' rights to their viewpoints, even if you believe them to be completely wrong.
2) Sourcing your information is highly recommended. Plagiarism will get you banned.
3) Please create a new thread for a new topic, even if you think it might not get a lot of responses. Do not create mega-threads.
4) If you think the subject of a thread is not important enough to merit a post, simply avoid posting in it. If enough people agree, it will fall off the page soon enough.
1) Remain civil. Respect others' rights to their viewpoints, even if you believe them to be completely wrong.
2) Sourcing your information is highly recommended. Plagiarism will get you banned.
3) Please create a new thread for a new topic, even if you think it might not get a lot of responses. Do not create mega-threads.
4) If you think the subject of a thread is not important enough to merit a post, simply avoid posting in it. If enough people agree, it will fall off the page soon enough.
- Prospero
- FKA Glue, The Other White Liquid
- Posts: 3630
- Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 9:53 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Island
"Strange" SETI@Home Signal.
http://news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=1028302004
Well, what fun is it if they just go "We got some random hydrogoen emissions!" They want more funding, and hinting at the possibility of first contact is the best way to get it even if the odds of it are very slim.
"I'll have to confess, Mr. Chairman, that I am also a video game player. I have worked my way up to Civilization IV. I haven't yet been able to beat it but I at least understand the fundamentals of it." - Texas Representative Joe Barton
- Killer-Rabbit
- Redshirt
- Posts: 2395
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 2:46 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Traverse City, Michigan
As CNN said...
I would expect an intelligent life form to attempt contact using something that the others would be looking at.It was broadcast on the main frequency at which the universe's most common element, hydrogen, absorbs and emits energy, and which astronomers say is the most likely means by which aliens would advertise their presence.
- Deacon
- Shining Adonis
- Posts: 44234
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 3:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Lakehills, TX
It's pure conjecture on the part of people who have gone so far down Conjecture Road that they've reached the intersection of Fantasy Lane and are all turned around, not sure which is which.
The follies which a man regrets the most in his life are those which he didn't commit when he had the opportunity. - Helen Rowland, A Guide to Men, 1922
- Imperator Severn
- Redshirt
- Posts: 5091
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 7:13 pm
- Location: Die
They want more funding
Nail. Head. Accurate application of violence.
SETI makes a fallacious assumption. The scientists seem to think that if there was life outside of Earth, it would want to talk to us.
Furthermore, why would people be watching the hydrogen frequency? Seems a bit noisy to me. I'd transmit in the clearest possible range.
- Killer-Rabbit
- Redshirt
- Posts: 2395
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 2:46 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Traverse City, Michigan
[quote="Imperator Severn";p="392542"]Furthermore, why would people be watching the hydrogen frequency? Seems a bit noisy to me. I'd transmit in the clearest possible range.[/quote]
Lets say you have two planets (A and B). Planet A has an evolved species thats attempting to contact other planets with life. Planet B however is unknown. Planet A has no idea of what Planet B's technology is like, they may be far beyond them or they may just barely be able to recieve a signal. To have the highest odds of finding Planet B, Planet A would want to assume that the inhabitants are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.
Now, say you are a civilization that is just starting to look out into the stars. Sure, you'd be monitoring all the frequencies you use. But Planet A would have a hell of a time figuring out what those are. So where would B start? Well, why not with mapping the most abundant element in the universe: Hydrogen. So Planet A figures that if Planet B is anywhere near space exploration, they are most likely going to be monitoring hydrogen's frequency. So A sends out a simple repeating signal and hopes somewhere out there, B is monitoring it.
(Note: Apart from looking for extraterrestrial intelligence, SETI@Home is also working on mapping the hydrogen in the universe...and digital watches are a pretty neat idea)
Lets say you have two planets (A and B). Planet A has an evolved species thats attempting to contact other planets with life. Planet B however is unknown. Planet A has no idea of what Planet B's technology is like, they may be far beyond them or they may just barely be able to recieve a signal. To have the highest odds of finding Planet B, Planet A would want to assume that the inhabitants are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.
Now, say you are a civilization that is just starting to look out into the stars. Sure, you'd be monitoring all the frequencies you use. But Planet A would have a hell of a time figuring out what those are. So where would B start? Well, why not with mapping the most abundant element in the universe: Hydrogen. So Planet A figures that if Planet B is anywhere near space exploration, they are most likely going to be monitoring hydrogen's frequency. So A sends out a simple repeating signal and hopes somewhere out there, B is monitoring it.
(Note: Apart from looking for extraterrestrial intelligence, SETI@Home is also working on mapping the hydrogen in the universe...and digital watches are a pretty neat idea)
- AlexanderBarca
- Redshirt
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 2:44 am
Re: "Strange" SETI@Home Signal.
The Astronomers are not the ones making the big fuss over this: As this report states, it's the media that's creating all the reactionary hubbub.
Much to my shame, this was farked.
Much to my shame, this was farked.
A man can have no better epitaph than that which is written on the hearts of his friends.
"..none of these things, I say, can make a man happy, unless he can win one more victory in addition to those the world thinks so great - the victory over himself."
-Arrian, The Campaigns of Alexander
"..none of these things, I say, can make a man happy, unless he can win one more victory in addition to those the world thinks so great - the victory over himself."
-Arrian, The Campaigns of Alexander
- Lunatic Jedi
- Redshirt
- Posts: 2885
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 7:44 am
- Real Name: Sam
- Gender: Male
- Location: I was hoping you could tell me.
- Zero_Point
- Redshirt
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:24 pm
- Location: Clovis... No, not California! New Mexico!!! Sheesh!
Re: "Strange" SETI@Home Signal.
It is kinda weird that they made such a fuss about them receiving a frequency that occurs naturally in the most abundant freakin' element in the universe... Seems kinda stupid to me. I mean, WE sent out a specific frequency to whoever is listening, so it only makes sense that in order for them to make us acknowledge that they exist and got our message, then why wouldn't they send a unique signal? One similar to the ones we sent, but different enough for us to assume that we didn't just receive an echo of the ones we sent.
- Killer-Rabbit
- Redshirt
- Posts: 2395
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 2:46 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Re: "Strange" SETI@Home Signal.
[quote="Zero_Point";p="392917"]I mean, WE sent out a specific frequency to whoever is listening, so it only makes sense that in order for them to make us acknowledge that they exist and got our message, then why wouldn't they send a unique signal? One similar to the ones we sent, but different enough for us to assume that we didn't just receive an echo of the ones we sent.[/quote]
No one ever said it was a reply to our signal.
No one ever said it was a reply to our signal.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


[/url]