Am I the only one that thinks this is a really bad idea?
Forum rules
1) Remain civil. Respect others' rights to their viewpoints, even if you believe them to be completely wrong.
2) Sourcing your information is highly recommended. Plagiarism will get you banned.
3) Please create a new thread for a new topic, even if you think it might not get a lot of responses. Do not create mega-threads.
4) If you think the subject of a thread is not important enough to merit a post, simply avoid posting in it. If enough people agree, it will fall off the page soon enough.
1) Remain civil. Respect others' rights to their viewpoints, even if you believe them to be completely wrong.
2) Sourcing your information is highly recommended. Plagiarism will get you banned.
3) Please create a new thread for a new topic, even if you think it might not get a lot of responses. Do not create mega-threads.
4) If you think the subject of a thread is not important enough to merit a post, simply avoid posting in it. If enough people agree, it will fall off the page soon enough.
- TheTallest
- Redshirt
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:53 am
- Location: UK
Am I the only one that thinks this is a really bad idea?
Black holes on Earth.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0523/p25s02-stss.html
It's all a bit "it should do this, we think"
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0523/p25s02-stss.html
It's all a bit "it should do this, we think"
I resurve the right to be inconsistant (and bad at spelling)
Deacon wrote: RISC processors are rubbish, and anyone that wants to know about them is rubbish.
I just find RISC processors very dull (unless you made it yourself, then that's impressive, it's like buying an expensive car, well done you can spend money.
I still have bigger penis than you.
- naval_aviator_2040
- Redshirt
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 4:52 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: NY Capital region
- Contact:
Re: Am I the only one that thinks this is a really bad idea?
cool theory but i don't want to be around if it doenst work.
i don't hate everyone equally, there are levels. but none of them are the traditionally thought of standards for predjudice. its not based on race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation its based on how much the person annoys me personally. i count you as a friend since you annoy me very little. brittney spears is an enemy because even though i don't know her/care about her at all she still finds a way to annoy me every time i turn on the tv
I like how the high school student makes a claim that is false.
It wouldn't drop to the center of the earth. It would stay where it was created and consume our planet.
It wouldn't drop to the center of the earth. It would stay where it was created and consume our planet.
Edward "Snugglepants" Van Helgen: What! You shot my banjo!
"Do I hear voices? I guess so. I don't worry though, because I have learned to ignore them. They keep telling me the Cubs will win the World Series." Calus
"Do I hear voices? I guess so. I don't worry though, because I have learned to ignore them. They keep telling me the Cubs will win the World Series." Calus
Um, I'm pretty much going to agree with the last couple paragraphs of the article, the black holes they are creating won't swallow anything. They won't have enough mass to attract anything to swallow before they "die". Also, with the masses they are talking about, the chances of coming anywhere near the event horizon are incredibly tiny. Remember, for a person to be a black hole they would have to occupy the space of an electron. The volume occupied by a few hundred protons would be so tiny that another nucleus could pass by it, within its electron cloud even, and deflect slightly without being absorbed into it.
Father of 3
- Hidden Sanity
- Highly Sophisticated Artificial Intelligence
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:37 am
- Location: East of my Tolkien books, south of my computer, west of my Sci-fi shelf, and north of my bed.
- TheTallest
- Redshirt
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:53 am
- Location: UK
I just got the impression that it's all a bit "we think it'll do this".
I know very little about black holes, but how do they know it won't just consume and get bigger?
I know very little about black holes, but how do they know it won't just consume and get bigger?
I resurve the right to be inconsistant (and bad at spelling)
Deacon wrote: RISC processors are rubbish, and anyone that wants to know about them is rubbish.
I just find RISC processors very dull (unless you made it yourself, then that's impressive, it's like buying an expensive car, well done you can spend money.
I still have bigger penis than you.
- Hidden Sanity
- Highly Sophisticated Artificial Intelligence
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:37 am
- Location: East of my Tolkien books, south of my computer, west of my Sci-fi shelf, and north of my bed.
- Seraphim
- Redshirt
- Posts: 2205
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 5:36 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Detroit, Michigan
I like how the high school student makes a claim that is false.
It wouldn't drop to the center of the earth. It would stay where it was created and consume our planet.
I was going by Steven Hawkings, who said a Black Hole on earth, would shift too the center of the planet (center of gravity), because there's no way to contain it. He was probablly talking about Black Holes much larger than these however.
Isn't there a rather large nuclear explosion (even with tiny ones) when a black hole dies?They won't have enough mass to attract anything to swallow before they "die".
Posted Wed Dec 08, 2004 6:33 pm:
Furthermore... might I ask what my being in High School has to do with anything? If I was mistaken, that's fine, there's no reason to condescend about it. I know more about quantum physics than a vast majority of adults I've met. While I'm sure I don't know as much as a college student majoring in it, there is no need to be so rude about it.
- Deacon
- Shining Adonis
- Posts: 44234
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 3:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Lakehills, TX
[quote="Seraphim";p="432546"]Isn't there a rather large nuclear explosion (even with tiny ones) when a black hole dies?[/quote]
I don't know about that... Are you thinking of a supernova? Has anyone witnessed a black hole "dying"?
I don't know about that... Are you thinking of a supernova? Has anyone witnessed a black hole "dying"?
The follies which a man regrets the most in his life are those which he didn't commit when he had the opportunity. - Helen Rowland, A Guide to Men, 1922
- Seraphim
- Redshirt
- Posts: 2205
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 5:36 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Detroit, Michigan
No one's witnessed a black hole period. But due to the application of quantum physics we can mathmatically deduce what we think should happen. I can't find my copy of a brief history of time, but bassically black holes are constantly leaking particles/waves, and the rate at which they leak grows exponentailly until it reaches a certain point where it just explodes out all at once. A baby black hole (one that isn't large enough to form under normal circumstances, but was able to in the beginning stages of the universe due to pressure...) has quite a powerful explosion if I remember correctly. So while one of these extremely miny black holes may not have the massive nuclear power of a baby black hole, it seems to me(hypothesizing) that if it has enough energy to become a black hole, that it would have enough energy to make a bit of an explosion.
Ok, they said that it has the mass of a few hundred protons. All of that mass is pretty much pure energy. We can calculate how much energy would be released.
As a simple thought experiment: if it had a mass of 1000 protons, with the mass of a proton (at rest) being 983.3 MeV/c^2 (useful form of mass for doing this stuff) if all of that mass was turned into energy during the explosion, you would have 1000*(983 MeV/c^2)*c^2=983 GeV.
983 GeV = 1.57 *10^(-7) J
That is enough energy to run a 60 W light bulb for 2.6 nanoseconds. In other words, the black holes they are planning to deal with have very, very little energy total. Just very high energy density.
As a simple thought experiment: if it had a mass of 1000 protons, with the mass of a proton (at rest) being 983.3 MeV/c^2 (useful form of mass for doing this stuff) if all of that mass was turned into energy during the explosion, you would have 1000*(983 MeV/c^2)*c^2=983 GeV.
983 GeV = 1.57 *10^(-7) J
That is enough energy to run a 60 W light bulb for 2.6 nanoseconds. In other words, the black holes they are planning to deal with have very, very little energy total. Just very high energy density.
Father of 3
I know that a lot of people assume black holes are just deadly universe eater things from which there is no escape, but that's just not true. A black hole the size of the sun, where the sun is now would have no effect on earth whatsoever, save that earth would freeze over.
Secondarily, black holes don't really "grow". Anything they "consume" gets completely crushed in the center and maintains only 3 features, being mass, charge, and angular momentum, and is then all ejected at superhigh velocities. A tiny black hole created in a lab would simply pull in any ultra small mass objects nearby (there'd probably always be a slow wind in the room, if it were exposed), and then eject it as destroyed matter.
I don't know anything about them dying, but it's safe to assume it wouldn't be pretty.
Somehow I also doubt if they can create a singularity, though. Right now, they have a hard enough time creating degenerate matter, and they CANNOT create pure neutron matter, which even THAT doesn't cause a black hole.
(To note: Creating a black hole from the earth would require compressing the entirety of the earth into about 1cm of space).
Secondarily, black holes don't really "grow". Anything they "consume" gets completely crushed in the center and maintains only 3 features, being mass, charge, and angular momentum, and is then all ejected at superhigh velocities. A tiny black hole created in a lab would simply pull in any ultra small mass objects nearby (there'd probably always be a slow wind in the room, if it were exposed), and then eject it as destroyed matter.
I don't know anything about them dying, but it's safe to assume it wouldn't be pretty.
Somehow I also doubt if they can create a singularity, though. Right now, they have a hard enough time creating degenerate matter, and they CANNOT create pure neutron matter, which even THAT doesn't cause a black hole.
(To note: Creating a black hole from the earth would require compressing the entirety of the earth into about 1cm of space).

Blaze, just to make sure, when you say a black whole the size of the sun, you are talking about its mass, correct? Because if you were talking about its volume, chances are there would be massive gravity waves ripping the Earth apart right now. A black hole the volume of the sun would have a much larger mass than the sun has and would have all of the issues that go along with that.
Father of 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Petalbot and 1 guest