In reference to a thread in General Chat about prostitution

Fixer · Post by **Fixer** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:08 pm

Coming from HERE

BillyBlaze · Post by **BillyBlaze** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:44 pm

Considering you'd be forcing someone into risking being infected with STD's, harming (and more than likely ending) personal relationships, and violating their moral and ethical standards, I'm voting no.

andvari_7 · Post by **andvari_7** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:26 pm

Uh, no. I know people who could have worked at like McDonald's or something, but they collected unemployment. But now they're employed and less stressful.

vixendrop · Post by **vixendrop** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:37 pm

BillyBlaze said it perfectly.

Nukinblackmage · Post by **Nukinblackmage** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:38 pm

Shouldn't be forced into sex line of work. If you want to work in the sex industry, then hey, to each their own.

Catine · Post by **Catine** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:04 pm

I'm shocked by the yes votes! It's perfectly acceptable that women be raped in order to collect unemployment...?

Fixer · Post by **Fixer** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:05 pm

Actually, they are only agreeing that if prostitution is legal that women who refuse should not collect unemployment. I doubt that anyone endorses rape.

Catine · Post by **Catine** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:18 pm

Of course nobody is endorsing rape. I'm just being snarky.

Am I understanding this right? You can either refuse to be a prostitute and get no unemployment benefits, or take the job that includes having sex against your will. But hey, at least you'd have a paycheck, and you aren't mooching off of society. Everybody wins!

ILurker · Post by **ILurker** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:18 pm

Engaging in prostitution under the threat of having your benefits revoked qualifies as performing sexual acts under coercion, which falls quite nicely into the category of rape.

Catine · Post by **Catine** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:24 pm

I miss daemon princess.

*sigh*

Ok, back on topic...

Nukinblackmage · Post by **Nukinblackmage** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:44 pm

Anyone who votes yes should be forced into protitution. If you refuse prostitution as a career, you're still unemployed, right? So you should get unemployment benefits. What about if a man is unemployed? Will you force him to have sex as a job? Sure, some guys will think that's a dream job, but what about someone who is a very strong christan and believes in no sex before marriage and he's unmarried? Will you force him to fuck against his religion?

Bullshit law

Khana · Post by **Khana** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 9:26 pm

I second ILurker. And what Nukinblackmage said has gone through my mind as well. How is it that this stupid law is only applied to women? There may not be very many women out there who make use of male prostitutes, but how about a nice homosexual brothel? Those of you who voted 'yes' (I'm going to assume you're male) would have nothing against being sent there, would you?! 'Cause after all, no matter what your moral beliefs or your sexual orientation, a job's a job right?

YH · Post by YH » Thu Feb 03, 2005 10:12 pm

[quote="Nukinblackmage";p="450459"] Sure, some guys will think that's a dream job, but what about someone who is a very strong christan and believes in no sex before marriage and he's unmarried? Will you force him to fuck against his religion?
[/quote]

You know, if you look at the replies in the actual thread, it's funny that you would ask that question....

Deacon · Post by **Deacon** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:08 pm

Yay, now we have 3 threads on the same topic!

edge · Post by **edge** » Fri Feb 04, 2005 4:02 pm

They should absolutly not be kept from recieving unemployment. It should be the woman's choice.

Real Life Forums

In reference to a thread in General Chat about prostitution

In places where prostitution is legal, should unemployed women who refuse to work as prostitutes be prevented from drawing unemployment?

In reference to a thread in General Chat about prostitution

Who is online