6th graders have sex in class w/teacher present

Perspectives on our world and our universe, how it works, what is happening, and why it happens. Whether by a hidden hand or natural laws, we come together to hash it out, and perhaps provide a little bit of education and enlightenment for others. This is a place for civil discussion. Please keep it that way.
Forum rules
1) Remain civil. Respect others' rights to their viewpoints, even if you believe them to be completely wrong.
2) Sourcing your information is highly recommended. Plagiarism will get you banned.
3) Please create a new thread for a new topic, even if you think it might not get a lot of responses. Do not create mega-threads.
4) If you think the subject of a thread is not important enough to merit a post, simply avoid posting in it. If enough people agree, it will fall off the page soon enough.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bigity
Redshirt
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:34 pm
Real Name: Stu
Gender: Male
Location: West Texas

Post by Bigity » Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:06 pm

[quote="minsx";p="722775"]Yeah that's the problem, sex ed is all fine and dandy (or not, as the case may be) but the earliest most people get it is Jr. High (and the earliest I got it was High School).

This is clearly not a failure of the Sex Ed. system, but I'd look long and hard at the parents.

P.S. I think the district handled it responsibly. Do you guys honestly think they SHOULD be screaming all the smarmy details to every media outlet? How would that help, exactly?[/quote]

Media outlets? I think parents should know, and the parents of the other students in the class.

Posted Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:11 am:

[quote="LQDMTL";p="722891"]This thread makes baby jesus cry.[/quote]

And your post makes SPACE cry.
No person was ever honored for what he received. Honor has been the reward for what he gave. -- Calvin Coolidge

Today's liberals wish to disarm us so they can run their evil and oppressive agenda on us. The fight against crime is just a convenient excuse to further their agenda. I don't know about you, but if you hear that Williams' guns have been taken, you'll know Williams is dead. -- Walter Williams, Professor of Economics, George Mason University

User avatar
babeighgyrl
Redshirt
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 11:30 am
Location: Newport Beach, Cali

Post by babeighgyrl » Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:18 pm

Ugh, that's just gross. I'm not surprised though, I know a couple ppl who started having sex at age 12, (I personally think it's disgusting doing it so early) but in the classroom with students and teacher around is completly messed up.

User avatar
wocket
Redshirt
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 8:01 pm
Gender: Female
Location: PA

Post by wocket » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:01 pm

[quote="JudgeMental";p="722878"]
Blaze, I don't really consider abstinence to be a goal to aspire to; I think of it as common sense. [/quote]

Some people think never getting married is common sense (don't want to deal with divorce? Don't deal with marriage to begin with!)
Some people think guarding yourself so you never fall in love is common sense.
Some people think never having children is common sense.
Some people think giving yourself completely over to another human being in one of the greatest acts of intimacy, whether you're married to that person or not, is common sense.

Should we ship these people off to nunneries? NO. We should let them have their differing opinions and Jesus Christ on a cracker we should support them because they likely have some very good reasons for their views.
Common sense is knowing that letting a baby play with a razor blade is a very bad idea. Common sense is not holding off on sex until marriage if you never want to get married or you can't get married or you never want to give yourself up emotionally but still want to have a good time.
Buy some Cute Stuff and support this woman.

User avatar
Bigity
Redshirt
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:34 pm
Real Name: Stu
Gender: Male
Location: West Texas

Post by Bigity » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:08 pm

Why isn't it?

Let's see..

No unwanted pregnancy
No STDs

Seems to make sense. Not the only way to achieve the results perhaps, but the only sure-fire way.
No person was ever honored for what he received. Honor has been the reward for what he gave. -- Calvin Coolidge

Today's liberals wish to disarm us so they can run their evil and oppressive agenda on us. The fight against crime is just a convenient excuse to further their agenda. I don't know about you, but if you hear that Williams' guns have been taken, you'll know Williams is dead. -- Walter Williams, Professor of Economics, George Mason University

User avatar
JudgeMental
Redshirt
Posts: 2138
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 1:48 am
Gender: Male
Location: Oregon

Post by JudgeMental » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:10 pm

Perhaps 'common' was the wrong word, because for me by my values and worldview abstinence makes the same kind of sense as not jumping out of a airplane without a parachute. I know other people hold different values and worldviews. I DO NOT agree with many of them, but I do know they exist. But IF my values were more widely shared, then yes, I think abstinence would be common sense, not some kind of goal to aspire to.

I have some specific thought about recreational sex, but I'll have to type those out later.

Posted Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:12 pm:

And wocket, I actually disagree with what you're implying, but I'll have to address that later as well. I'm just trying to establish that no, my head is not up my ass.
Image

"HTRN, you've failed. Give up now and praise the awesomeness that is JudgeMental." - Arc Orion

User avatar
StruckingFuggle
Redshirt
Posts: 22166
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin / San Marcos, Tx

Post by StruckingFuggle » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:18 pm

No, Bigity. Using protection if you want to have sex is common sense. Avoiding the sex you want to have in and of itself merely because of either moralism or fear of STDs/pregnancy isn't common sense, its going too far and into the realm of common nonsense.

Yes, even among perfect users, the failure rate for condoms isn't 0%, but its damn, damn close. And common sense isn't, necessarily, ever sticking only to the things that have 0% failure rates.
"He who lives by the sword dies by my arrow."

"In your histories, there are continual justifications for all manner of hellish actions. Claims of nobility and heritage and honor to cover up every bit of genocide, assassination, and massacre. At least the Horde is honest in their naked lust for power."

User avatar
Bigity
Redshirt
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:34 pm
Real Name: Stu
Gender: Male
Location: West Texas

Post by Bigity » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:21 pm

Wrong.

Common sense tells you the best way to avoid pregnancy and STDs is to not engage in activity that includes those risks. Period.

The fact you don't agree with that one possible behavior has nothing to do with it being common sense.

Common sense does also tell you that using protection is better than no protection, however.
No person was ever honored for what he received. Honor has been the reward for what he gave. -- Calvin Coolidge

Today's liberals wish to disarm us so they can run their evil and oppressive agenda on us. The fight against crime is just a convenient excuse to further their agenda. I don't know about you, but if you hear that Williams' guns have been taken, you'll know Williams is dead. -- Walter Williams, Professor of Economics, George Mason University

User avatar
wocket
Redshirt
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 8:01 pm
Gender: Female
Location: PA

Post by wocket » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:28 pm

I just don't like the implication that somebody who was witness to domestic violence, or a string of divorces, or just a really bad loveless marriage should never be able to experience sex because they don't want to go through something incredibly painful like that themselves.

Sex was made to be enjoyable. No, really. Did you not notice that it feels good? It also brings two people who are in love and have mutual respect for one another even closer together. That's why it's often called "taking the relationship to the next level". To deny someone of one of the most beautiful things in life is just cruel, especially since it might result in an unwanted pregnancy, or it might give you a disease.
Buy some Cute Stuff and support this woman.

User avatar
Bigity
Redshirt
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:34 pm
Real Name: Stu
Gender: Male
Location: West Texas

Post by Bigity » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:40 pm

What are you even going on about?

I can't find a post where someone said sex is evil and shouldn't be enjoyed. Can you point that post out to me or are you just railing about something nobody here is arguing?
No person was ever honored for what he received. Honor has been the reward for what he gave. -- Calvin Coolidge

Today's liberals wish to disarm us so they can run their evil and oppressive agenda on us. The fight against crime is just a convenient excuse to further their agenda. I don't know about you, but if you hear that Williams' guns have been taken, you'll know Williams is dead. -- Walter Williams, Professor of Economics, George Mason University

User avatar
Deacon
Shining Adonis
Posts: 44234
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 3:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Lakehills, TX

Post by Deacon » Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:30 pm

[quote="wocket";p="722933"]Some people think giving yourself completely over to another human being in one of the greatest acts of intimacy, whether you're married to that person or not, is common sense.[/quote]
While I think I get what you're generally trying to say, that sentence itself doesn't really make a lot of sense. "Some people think having sex is common sense." It just doesn't seem to work.

[quote="wocket";p="722943"]I just don't like the implication that somebody who was witness to domestic violence, or a string of divorces, or just a really bad loveless marriage should never be able to experience sex because they don't want to go through something incredibly painful like that themselves.[/quote]
...

How are domestic violence and loveless relationships and a string of painful breakups exclusive to marriage? You certainly doesn't need to be married to go through that, and you DEFINITELY do not have to get married to experience great pain in relationships, and the pain and difficulty of break-ups only increases when you're also sexual partners...


[quote="StruckingFuggle";p="722940"]No, Bigity. Using protection if you want to have sex is common sense. Avoiding the sex you want to have in and of itself merely because of either moralism or fear of STDs/pregnancy isn't common sense, its going too far and into the realm of common nonsense.[/quote]
I don't know... Some people would say that avoiding deciding not to drive a car at 220 mph is common sense, while your logic would say that no, it's not. Instead, it would say that wearing a helmet and installing a roll cage first would be common sense. Or even simply not wrecking would be common sense... I think the point's just been overmuddled by now.
Yes, even among perfect users, the failure rate for condoms isn't 0%, but its damn, damn close.
Few people are perfect users. I think the consensus is that abstinence is 100% effective and has a 0% failure rate, but that if you're not going to be abstinent, if you are going to be fucking around, then at least you should be using protection so that you can reduce the risks involved--whether by 40% or 90%, it's still safer.

At the same time others say it takes a lot of the pleasure out of it for them, so...
Last edited by Deacon on Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The follies which a man regrets the most in his life are those which he didn't commit when he had the opportunity. - Helen Rowland, A Guide to Men, 1922

User avatar
wocket
Redshirt
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 8:01 pm
Gender: Female
Location: PA

Post by wocket » Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:30 pm

Blaze, I don't really consider abstinence to be a goal to aspire to; I think of it as common sense.
Let's see..

No unwanted pregnancy
No STDs

Seems to make sense.
Quotes like that? Those are, pure and simple, "don't have sex before marriage" quotes. I could have misunderstood but I honestly don't think I did.
No, nobody said you shouldn't enjoy sex. But it was said that sex shouldn't be enjoyed outside of marriage. I am specifically addressing that and saying "what about people who do not ever want to get married?".
Buy some Cute Stuff and support this woman.

User avatar
Deacon
Shining Adonis
Posts: 44234
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 3:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Lakehills, TX

Post by Deacon » Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:33 pm

You mean life-long monogamous relationships that simply have not been given a ceremony?
The follies which a man regrets the most in his life are those which he didn't commit when he had the opportunity. - Helen Rowland, A Guide to Men, 1922

User avatar
Bigity
Redshirt
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:34 pm
Real Name: Stu
Gender: Male
Location: West Texas

Post by Bigity » Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:35 pm

My post was in response to the claim you made that abstinence isn't possibly common sense, which is flat out incorrect.

If you read either of those as some kind of attack against sex, well that's nothing I can help you with.
No person was ever honored for what he received. Honor has been the reward for what he gave. -- Calvin Coolidge

Today's liberals wish to disarm us so they can run their evil and oppressive agenda on us. The fight against crime is just a convenient excuse to further their agenda. I don't know about you, but if you hear that Williams' guns have been taken, you'll know Williams is dead. -- Walter Williams, Professor of Economics, George Mason University

User avatar
Blaze
Redshirt
Posts: 20221
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 10:31 pm
Location: Michigan

Post by Blaze » Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:36 pm

wocket - Isn't this thread, and in fact all threads, for discussing opinion and point of view? Because I'm fairly sure any suggestions you can offer as to how to approach the situation, or any situation, are no more right or wrong than any other. Abstinence is VERY MUCH common sense to some people. It is, truly, the best way to avoid some of the problems inherent with sex.
Image

User avatar
StruckingFuggle
Redshirt
Posts: 22166
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin / San Marcos, Tx

Post by StruckingFuggle » Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:52 pm

I think the consensus is that abstinence is 100% effective and has a 0% failure rate
only if you very, very carefully define "effective" and "failure rate", and don't involve 'programs promoting abstinence' in the statistics. Plus, abstinence as a means of safe sex is kind of like not driving as a means of avoiding getting into a wreck.

Which would be a much more apt analogy to what I said previously than yours about speeding.
"He who lives by the sword dies by my arrow."

"In your histories, there are continual justifications for all manner of hellish actions. Claims of nobility and heritage and honor to cover up every bit of genocide, assassination, and massacre. At least the Horde is honest in their naked lust for power."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest