Fuel Economy

Perspectives on our world and our universe, how it works, what is happening, and why it happens. Whether by a hidden hand or natural laws, we come together to hash it out, and perhaps provide a little bit of education and enlightenment for others. This is a place for civil discussion. Please keep it that way.
Forum rules
1) Remain civil. Respect others' rights to their viewpoints, even if you believe them to be completely wrong.
2) Sourcing your information is highly recommended. Plagiarism will get you banned.
3) Please create a new thread for a new topic, even if you think it might not get a lot of responses. Do not create mega-threads.
4) If you think the subject of a thread is not important enough to merit a post, simply avoid posting in it. If enough people agree, it will fall off the page soon enough.
Post Reply
User avatar
adciv
Redshirt
Posts: 11723
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:20 am
Real Name: Lord Al-Briaca
Location: Middle of Nowhere, MD

Fuel Economy

Post by adciv » Fri Aug 22, 2008 2:21 am

Earlier today I went to a Honda Dealership while both my parents vehicles were in for servicing. Now, as my parents have owned Hondas since '86, I have payed attention to them for several years. Now, as has been said, the Japanese manufacturers have traditionally had higher fuel economy than the US cars. However, between the sticker mileages I saw earlier and real world mileage on my parents and my own cars, I have noticed a significant decrease in the fuel economy of the newer cars. My mothers '96 Odyssey gets 25/33 city/highway. The new Odyseeys are listed as 16/26. The new accords are listed as 21/31, mine gets 25/37. I was curious if anyone else had noticed these trends. It is worrying(?)/interesting(?) that Honda, of all manufacturers, has had that much of a drop.

To repeat, the numbers give for my accord and my mothers Odyssey are real world, while the ones for the new vehicles are the sticker listing.
Repensum Est Canicula
The most dangerous words from an Engineer: "I have an idea."
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Nagasaki
Redshirt
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:04 am
Real Name: Nina
Gender: Female
Location: Denton, TX

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by Nagasaki » Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:32 am

That is kinda interesting, you would think especially the way things are now that would be a huge selling point. Maybe they've changed the way they calculate the MPG within the last few years?
Image

User avatar
Martin Blank
Knower of Things
Knower of Things
Posts: 12709
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2003 4:11 am
Real Name: Jarrod Frates
Gender: Male
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by Martin Blank » Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:07 am

Model year 2008 and later vehicles are on a completely new mileage calculation method. The old one essentially was done under perfect conditions. The new method accounts for traffic conditions, use of air conditioning, and so forth. Most cars tested under old and new lost 10% to 15% of their mileage levels from before.
If I show up at your door, chances are you did something to bring me there.

ampersand
Redshirt
Posts: 7404
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 11:43 pm
Real Name: Andrew Kunz
Gender: Male
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by ampersand » Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:50 am

I heard as a kind of a joke that the average American walks 900 miles a year and drinks 22 gallons of alcohol a year, thus giving the mean American an average mpg of 40.909. Ought to be the gold standard for car efficiency, methinks.

User avatar
Martin Blank
Knower of Things
Knower of Things
Posts: 12709
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2003 4:11 am
Real Name: Jarrod Frates
Gender: Male
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by Martin Blank » Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:07 am

22 gallons?

WTF... I am so far behind...
If I show up at your door, chances are you did something to bring me there.

User avatar
The Cid
Redshirt
Posts: 7150
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 12:23 pm
Real Name: Tim Williams
Gender: Male
Location: The Suncoast
Contact:

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by The Cid » Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:00 am

ampersand wrote:I heard as a kind of a joke that the average American walks 900 miles a year and drinks 22 gallons of alcohol a year, thus giving the mean American an average mpg of 40.909. Ought to be the gold standard for car efficiency, methinks.
A) The average American walks 900 miles a year? Yeah, right.
B) The average American is drinking close to two gallons of alcohol per month? The average fraternity member doesn't drink that much!!
Image
Hirschof wrote:I'm waiting for day you people start thinking with portals.

User avatar
StruckingFuggle
Redshirt
Posts: 22166
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin / San Marcos, Tx

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by StruckingFuggle » Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:15 am

Well, the average american can be below the average values, if the outliers are big enough, and there's probably a LOT of alcoholics out there, coupled with college students...
"He who lives by the sword dies by my arrow."

"In your histories, there are continual justifications for all manner of hellish actions. Claims of nobility and heritage and honor to cover up every bit of genocide, assassination, and massacre. At least the Horde is honest in their naked lust for power."

User avatar
Arc Orion
Redshirt
Posts: 11967
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 7:27 am
Real Name: Christopher
Gender: Male
Location: Tacoma, WA
Contact:

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by Arc Orion » Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:23 am

I dunno. Unless you're measuring just the alcohol content, it's not that out of the realm of possibility. A can of beer is 12 ounces, and with a gallon being 128 ounces, it would only take about a couple of dozen cans to surpass two gallons.

As for the walking, I spend most of my day walking around the store. In addition to that, even with a car, I still spend plenty of time walking from one place to another. I probably walk over two miles during a whole work day. On top of that, with my regular exercise, I jog altogether at least another fifteen miles or so a week. That adds up. Note, I'm not claiming I'm the average American, but with a little math, it appears that I will put at least 1300 miles into my personal locomotion within a year.
I need fewer water.

User avatar
StruckingFuggle
Redshirt
Posts: 22166
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin / San Marcos, Tx

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by StruckingFuggle » Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:27 am

Arc Orion wrote:I dunno. Unless you're measuring just the alcohol content, it's not that out of the realm of possibility. A can of beer is 12 ounces, and with a gallon being 128 ounces, it would only take about a couple of dozen cans to surpass two gallons.
Though hand, beer, especially american beer, isn't very energy effiicent, so actually ... if you just go by sheer liquid, it's an almost useless measurement...

... I would like to see the data on this, though, including the info on the actual study. :o Could be interesting.
"He who lives by the sword dies by my arrow."

"In your histories, there are continual justifications for all manner of hellish actions. Claims of nobility and heritage and honor to cover up every bit of genocide, assassination, and massacre. At least the Horde is honest in their naked lust for power."

User avatar
Arc Orion
Redshirt
Posts: 11967
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 7:27 am
Real Name: Christopher
Gender: Male
Location: Tacoma, WA
Contact:

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by Arc Orion » Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:43 am

We have gone from fuel economy to beer economy within the space of ten posts. I love RLF.
I need fewer water.

ampersand
Redshirt
Posts: 7404
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 11:43 pm
Real Name: Andrew Kunz
Gender: Male
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by ampersand » Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:46 am

I don't know where he got the alcohol data, but the walking came from a Harvard (I presume Harvard School of Medicine) study. Then again, I heard it on Car Talk, so who knows?
StruckingFuggle wrote:Well, the average american can be below the average values, if the outliers are big enough, and there's probably a LOT of alcoholics out there, coupled with college students...
I think you mean the median american can be below the average (or mean) values. Which in this case, the curve would probably be right-leaning in terms of skewness. (Yes, I was reading a statistics book last weekend.)

User avatar
StruckingFuggle
Redshirt
Posts: 22166
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin / San Marcos, Tx

Re: Fuel Economy

Post by StruckingFuggle » Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:11 am

*fffacepalm*

NOW I need to re-read my Stats textbook before I can comment on statistics again. Muurgle... at least it's just the easy conceptual stuff, not a lot into the guts of the tests...


AGH ANOVAS. WE HAVE SPSS FOR A REASON.
"He who lives by the sword dies by my arrow."

"In your histories, there are continual justifications for all manner of hellish actions. Claims of nobility and heritage and honor to cover up every bit of genocide, assassination, and massacre. At least the Horde is honest in their naked lust for power."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Petalbot and 1 guest