Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Talk about today's strip, or anything about the comic in general. You can also talk about any of the characters... but don't expect a response. They're FICTIONAL, you guys... sheesh. :)
User avatar
Kraggh
Redshirt
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 5:59 pm
Real Name: John Hooyer

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by Kraggh » Fri May 29, 2009 11:06 pm

Concerning those who have commented on my color,
Okay, I will stop. Although I might be tempted to try out chartreuse... :D

Concerning EBwiz,
EBwiz wrote:@Kraggh: Fair enough. I can't respond to that entire post because, damn, that was a lot. Anyway, I'd say you're right about a lot (Except maybe the part about sales not being reality, but that's also because I'm a game developer myself) of things there and I'm glad you clarified.
Sales themselves are reality. Sales are facts. The marriage of fact and logic is what forms a sound opinion. In other words, sales are real, but opinions on what should be done to improve sales is theory. I can see where the overall theme of the post might have seemed confusing around that area, though, so I can't blame any misunderstandings. It happens all the time.
EBwiz wrote:Yeah, Greg is allowed to state his preference, and that's cool. He's also allowed to say it doesn't have any good games in a comic, because it's a comic and it's supposed to be funny, and hyperbole is a good tool for humor. Still, I figured we'd see the kind of system war nonsense we always see, and jumped to the forum because hell, it's good discussion.
It is good how it gives the Wii lovers an excuse to retaliate and make fun of whatever Greg is a fan of (I'm not totally sure right now), which is all in good fun. Hyperbole, yes, is definitely good. I couldn't have said it better myself.
EBwiz wrote:However, even if you don't like any game for the Wii (And I can't imagine that being the case for everyone) you can't just say the Wii doesn't have any good games. That's not an opinion - it's just blatantly wrong. You can say "I don't like any games for the Wii", (Or rather "I don't like any of the games I have played for the Wii so far"). What makes something bad is how it's made, not personal preference.
Well, now we are getting very technical on how someone can state how something fits their preferences. The wording of such statements range from poor to perfect. It's usually the former, though I prefer the latter. You're right with both of those example statements, and I can see how "None of the games on the Wii are good" is improper. "Good" can be confused with something other than preference.

However, I think that it is important to acknowledge that an opinion can be wrong, even blatantly wrong. I can have an opinion that all Americans are hopeless slobs without variation. It would be blatantly wrong, but it would still be an opinion.

Of course, sometimes people will base an entire opinion off of their tastes. It would be a fallacy to essentially say "The Wii will fail because I don't like it." The specific fallacy is called personal incredulity, the idea that because something seems hard to personally believe, it must be false. In this case, if someone has a hard time liking the Wii themselves, sometimes it can be hard to believe that others would, too.
EBwiz wrote:I think it's a very important distinction to make, because when you start to generalize, that's when flame wars start, or worse, people just snuff out conversation altogether by hiding behind the "it's my opinion!" defense, and that's what started to scare me about this thread and you're initial post.
The "It's my opinion!" defense is indeed a fallacy. One of the reasons is that people often confuse opinions with tastes. Certainly, one can say, in various ways, that they are not a fan of the Wii. Heck, it can be said and just be left at that. However, once someone uses the word "opinion", then there is fallacy. People do not like fallacy. Sometimes one cannot put their finger down on what is wrong with a statement, but if they can sense it, they will often pounce.

Also, it is good to discuss exactly what your tastes are. It is beneficial to be clearly understood.
EBwiz wrote:Over all though, it seems we agree that people can have their tastes and discuss it, so we'll leave it at that.
Agreed.

Concerning Greg Dean,
Actually, I'll admit, when it comes to wording, that makeshift strip was awesome, and the abnormality of it got me laughing. If you are familiar with Andy Weir, he had a term called one-percenter jokes, or jokes that very few would find amusing but would pack an extra punch for them because they weren't expecting it. In this case, I'm in the 1%.

Kraggh
Image
Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you.

User avatar
adciv
Redshirt
Posts: 11723
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:20 am
Real Name: Lord Al-Briaca
Location: Middle of Nowhere, MD

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by adciv » Fri May 29, 2009 11:12 pm

Kraggh wrote:Concerning those who have commented on my color,
Okay, I will stop. Although I might be tempted to try out chartreuse... :D
That's yellow. Chartreuse has less Red in it. This is chartreuse
Repensum Est Canicula
The most dangerous words from an Engineer: "I have an idea."
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson

tnitnetny
Redshirt
Posts: 2555
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 5:42 pm
Real Name: Toni
Gender: Female
Location: Crofton, MD
Contact:

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by tnitnetny » Fri May 29, 2009 11:39 pm

Hahaha. Adciv can't get chartreuse either! Maybe I will show you what color chartreuse is when I see you tomorrow.

Much Better! Thank you! Once you stop using color all the time, your posts are very intelligent and fantastic. Please make an intro thread and participate more often!

bagheadinc
Bay Harbor Butcher
Posts: 7928
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:25 pm
Real Name: Matthew
Gender: Male
Location: Fruitland, MD
Contact:

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by bagheadinc » Sat May 30, 2009 12:01 am

tnitnetny wrote:Hahaha. Adciv can't get chartreuse either!
No, he was right. That is traditional chartreuse. This is web chartreuse.
Image

ampersand
Redshirt
Posts: 7404
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 11:43 pm
Real Name: Andrew Kunz
Gender: Male
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by ampersand » Sat May 30, 2009 12:58 am

Wait, web chartreuse is lime green? Freaky.

Okay, I get that serious gamers prefer just about anything (including the Nintendo DS) over the Wii, but why 360 over PS3? It's like Microsoft laced their 360s with crack (which may explain why they go down so frequently) even though the PS3 has better graphics than the 360.

And tnit, I didn't have a problem with the blue text. Yellow or chartreuse, on the other hand was really hard to read. And orange would be a problem too.

User avatar
Rikku_Chan
Redshirt
Posts: 411
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 9:01 pm
Real Name: Kiki
Gender: Female
Location: The Blood Gulch

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by Rikku_Chan » Sat May 30, 2009 1:14 am

As a Japanese citizen, I have this to say about the Wii: The Wii sucks. 360 is king. YOUR WORLD IS SHATTERED.
Image
私はアメリカを愛する

User avatar
adciv
Redshirt
Posts: 11723
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:20 am
Real Name: Lord Al-Briaca
Location: Middle of Nowhere, MD

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by adciv » Sat May 30, 2009 1:52 am

*glomp* What's a Japanese Citizen doing in the US Navy? :o
Repensum Est Canicula
The most dangerous words from an Engineer: "I have an idea."
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
JamesGecko
Redshirt
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Longview, TX
Contact:

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by JamesGecko » Sat May 30, 2009 1:58 am

The one Wii game recommendation list to rule them all!

Though, seriously. If stuff like Excitebots doesn't look like an amazing multiplayer game to you, you may need to just sell your wii and buy some more Xbox games.

User avatar
adciv
Redshirt
Posts: 11723
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:20 am
Real Name: Lord Al-Briaca
Location: Middle of Nowhere, MD

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by adciv » Sat May 30, 2009 2:30 am

Saw it, but I'm more of a Mario Kart guy. That list reminds me. I need to get the Metroid Trilogy when it comes out for the Wii.
Repensum Est Canicula
The most dangerous words from an Engineer: "I have an idea."
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Deacon
Shining Adonis
Posts: 44234
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 3:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Lakehills, TX

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by Deacon » Sat May 30, 2009 6:06 pm

ampersand wrote:even though the PS3 has better graphics than the 360.
Does it really, though? I have a PS3, not a 360, but the lack of FSAA still pisses me off every time I see it. I don't see how the PS3 has noticeably better graphics than the 360, but the 360 often "feels" like it looks better due to the FSAA.
The follies which a man regrets the most in his life are those which he didn't commit when he had the opportunity. - Helen Rowland, A Guide to Men, 1922

Durgan
Redshirt
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:28 pm

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by Durgan » Sun May 31, 2009 12:11 am

Deacon wrote:
ampersand wrote:even though the PS3 has better graphics than the 360.
Does it really, though? I have a PS3, not a 360, but the lack of FSAA still pisses me off every time I see it. I don't see how the PS3 has noticeably better graphics than the 360, but the 360 often "feels" like it looks better due to the FSAA.
He might be referring to the fact that it can do 1080p, whereas 360 only goes up to 1080i. Even that isn't exactly a "full-on" positive, however, as not everyone (including myself) have a 1080p-capable set. I was one of the people who bought a 42" 720p/1080i plasma back when the 1080p plasmas were still ridiculously expensive (also, the same-size LCDs looked like crap by comparison to my eyes).

The problem is, even if it were a point that applied to everyone, graphics aren't everything - and I'm not making that point from a pro-Wii perspective, as is normally the case with that statement. The 360 and PS3 have a large number of games that are very pretty too look at, have great immersion, alot of action, a good story, good online multiplayer (something which, as far as I know, the Wii still can't do well), and even replayability. Once you take away the games that I already had on the DS (Mario Kart and the Brain Age games, etc), that Zelda was both ugly and boring as hell (IMO), and that I already had a deep well of free ROMs for all of the old VC games on my PSP 2000 homebrew (honestly, 8-10+ bucks for 20 year old games? WTF?), there is just no reason for someone like me to buy a Wii.

Gwaendel
Redshirt
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:53 pm

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by Gwaendel » Sun May 31, 2009 12:23 am

All I know is that DX 10 features on the 360 like motion blur actually make Tekken 6 look terrible.

ampersand
Redshirt
Posts: 7404
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 11:43 pm
Real Name: Andrew Kunz
Gender: Male
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by ampersand » Sun May 31, 2009 12:24 am

I did say that the PS3 has better graphics than the 360. I just didn't say they were that far superior, though. And I didn't just mean resolution. In my opinion, when you compare the fluidity and color of the graphics of a similar game for the 360 & PS3 (as in a Madden game), the images, sound, color, animation, etc. were better on a PS3 than 360. Just enough to notice. I consider both systems pretty even everywhere else.

bagheadinc
Bay Harbor Butcher
Posts: 7928
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:25 pm
Real Name: Matthew
Gender: Male
Location: Fruitland, MD
Contact:

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by bagheadinc » Sun May 31, 2009 3:27 am

Durgan wrote:He might be referring to the fact that it can do 1080p, whereas 360 only goes up to 1080i.
The 360 has been able to do 1080p for quite a while now.
Image

User avatar
serindela
Redshirt
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:29 am
Real Name: Crissy Gottberg
Gender: Female
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Ir-wii-sponsible - May 29, 2009

Post by serindela » Sun May 31, 2009 3:39 am

Lucksi wrote:Ok, so I have one too. But it´s (sadly) the least played console in my household, even less than the PS2 which I only use since the PS3 doesn´t play NTSC games from the PS2. Stupid Wii doesn´t work with my big LCD screen for some reason. Had no problems with my older smaller TV, but now it´s off by about 10 inches to where I´m pointing..
That is odd. It works fine with my 42 inch flat screen...
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest