What this guy is saying is quite interesting and is true.. but the reasons are not fully correct. I believe it's a remnant survival tactic. An instinct. Think basically--really basic. You are born with two brothers. Your two brothers become smarter, therefore, will be able to produce better offspring that will rival yours. Therefore.. you eliminate your brothers in order to produce the dominant offspring.Why? Once again, anyone currently in school might think this a strange question to ask. How could things be any other way? But they could be. Adults don't normally persecute nerds. Why do teenage kids do it?
Partly it's because teenagers are still half children, and many children are just intrinsically cruel. Some torture nerds for the same reason they pull the legs off spiders. Before you develop a conscience, torture is amusing.
Of course, this is a really, really extreme example. But you understand what I'm getting at. He's not incorrect in his analysis, but it seems as though he's being a little bias. You have to give these "popular children" some credit here. Not all of them are inherently evil. It's more of an instinct.
But I found this observation really, really sharp.Because they're at the bottom of the scale, nerds are a safe target for the entire school. If I remember correctly, the most popular kids don't persecute nerds; they don't need to stoop to such things. Most of the persecution comes from kids lower down, the nervous middle classes.
The trouble is, there are a lot of them. I suspect the distribution of popularity is not a pyramid, but tapers at the bottom like a pear. The least popular group is quite small. (I believe we were the only D table in our cafeteria map.) So there are more people who want to pick on nerds than there are nerds.




