What's your monitor resolution?

Infin8Cyn · Post by **Infin8Cyn** » Tue Jul 22, 2003 4:45 pm

1280x1024 at work.
Was running my system @ home at 2048, but had issues as Divx Movies had to be enlarged so much, so I dropped back to 1600x1200, and sometimes for lower Qual movies, 1280x1024

Brim Mar · Post by **Brim Mar** » Tue Jul 22, 2003 4:55 pm

Grumlen · Post by **Grumlen** » Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:00 pm

I have a flat panel, so while its neat and all it can't handle all that high of resolution. Still, its not like I need the resolution to be any higher than it already is, which is 1280x1024.

Idiot'sPride · Post by **Idiot'sPride** » Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:07 pm

I'm running 1024 x 768, since my monitor isn't very good and can't handle much...

billf · Post by **billf** » Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:36 pm

back in my day all we had was 640X480, uphill, both ways, in four feet of snow, with no shoes! And we were happy with it! Dagnabbit!

/me shakes his cane

SothThe69th · Post by **SothThe69th** » Tue Jul 22, 2003 6:51 pm

4 x 3

>.>
<.<

Eihger · Post by **Eihger** » Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:32 pm

yes, yes soth, we all know you need pixels the size of mellons

Post by **Martin Blank** » Tue Jul 22, 2003 9:15 pm

I run 1600x1200x32, but I once discovered that Windows 98 has a hidden, non-accessible setting for 320x240x1.

Yes, that is 320x240, black and white. No grays. It was really, really weird. I found it when I was arguing with drivers, and I rebooted to show them who was boss, and that display came up.

Apparently, I wasn't the boss.

Calus · Post by **Calus** » Tue Jul 22, 2003 9:37 pm

I don't really feel the need to use anything over 1024 x 768.

Skorpion · Post by **Skorpion** » Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:13 pm

Apparently, I wasn't the boss.

*falls about laughing*

Windows never responds to demonstrations of strength.
Especially of the claw hammer kind. Dented case=bad.

Back to the topic...
1024*768. My monitor won't support higher.

Should I get a plasmascreen, or not? Hmm...

deprecated · Post by **deprecated** » Wed Jul 23, 2003 12:59 am

SPARCstation: 1152x900 on two monitors with 2304x1800 logical desktop.
SGI: 1280x1024 on one monitor.

All three monitors are 20" Sun-branded Sony Trinitrons. I kinda like
the fact that these monitors don't work at 640x480. I'm not even
sure they bother with 800x600. They should work at 1600x1200 if
the correct sense-pins are shorted, but I haven't felt the need so far.

Sola · Post by **Sola** » Wed Jul 23, 2003 1:45 am

I'm at 1024x768. I'm surprised how many people still run on 800x600, though - most of my friends and family sort of think it strange that one would want it any bigger than that.

Jamie Bond · Post by **Jamie Bond** » Wed Jul 23, 2003 1:55 am

1280 x 960

I guess thats an odd resolution?

spoon · Post by **spoon** » Wed Jul 23, 2003 1:58 am

128x6168 XD

1028x768, actually

TopCat · Post by **TopCat** » Wed Jul 23, 2003 1:59 am

did you know that 1280 by 1024 is not a real 4x3 resolution, you know, 320x240? the real 4x3 is 1280x920 or somthing like that. thats why i have it set at that resolution, so when i maximize tv, i dont get black bars. deally YO!

EDIT: Non accessable, martin? http://www.nullsoft.com/free/jres/

Real Life Forums

What's your monitor resolution?

[ Poll ] What's your monitor resolution?

What's your monitor resolution?

Re: What's your monitor resolution?

Re: What's your monitor resolution?

Who is online