Lena=Hot(for a cartoon chick)

Leeloo · Post by **Leeloo** » Thu Oct 30, 2003 8:08 pm

Okay, now someone show us how 2+2=5!

Mandor · Post by **Mandor** » Thu Oct 30, 2003 8:16 pm

[quote="StarDeath88";p="202100"]ok here (you can only be anal if you know what your talking about)[/quote]

I have already demonstrated you how utterly stupid your signature is, so you just knock it off now.

Roland of Gilead · Post by **Roland of Gilead** » Fri Oct 31, 2003 12:30 am

*rocks back and forth in chair mumbling* Brain.......hurts.......the pain......

Arina · Post by **Arina** » Fri Oct 31, 2003 3:12 pm

oh, so sad

Zero_Point · Post by **Zero_Point** » Wed Nov 05, 2003 7:55 pm

...Brain?

I like pie · Post by **I like pie** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 2:23 am

[quote="Mandor";p="202141"][quote="StarDeath88";p="202100"]ok here (you can only be anal if you know what your talking about)[/quote]

I have already demonstrated you how utterly stupid your signature is, so you just knock it off now.[/quote]

I am so glad that I'm not the only one who sees this.

This and the girls and money one always irritate me.

Girls and money is Girls + Money NOT (Girls)(Money). Sheesh.

aramil · Post by **aramil** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 9:35 pm

I always thought it was Girls=Utter Evil?

I like pie · Post by **I like pie** » Thu Nov 06, 2003 10:08 pm

well that's what it came out to at the end

Time is money, therefor Time = Money

Girls require time and money, or Money^2 (since time = money,)

So Girls = Money^2

and money is the root of all evil so

Girls = (Root Of Evil)^2

The root of a value squared is the value (squaring the root cancels it out)

So Girls = Evil

^^ the problem with that is this:

Girls require time and money, or Money^2 (since time = money,)

So Girls = Money^2

Girls = Time AND Money. "and" represents addition, not multiplication

so Girls = Time + Money, or Money + Money, not (Money)(Money) or Money^2. at best it can be represented as 2(Money) but even that throws off the whole equation

yeah I know i'm a big dork, but whenever anybody posts that stupid picture I feel obligated to be an ass and point out the flaw. Just like with StarDeath88's sig, which I've seen more commonly as a proof of 2 = 1.

It's just a bunch of flawed math.

^^stupid

5h1|27_|\|1|\|j4 · Post by **5h1|27_|\|1|\|j4** » Sat Nov 08, 2003 5:51 am

yeah? well.. well.. uhm.. umn.. cheese?

AcesWild · Post by **AcesWild** » Tue Nov 11, 2003 12:00 am

[quote="StarDeath88";p="202100"]

a+b=c--This could be correct, as C could be anything
4a-3a+4b-3b=4c-3c --WRONG--it =1a+1b
4a+4b-4c=3a+3b-3c --were the hell did the threes come from!?4a+4b-4c=4a+4b-4c
4(a+b-c)=3(a+b-c) --again with the frikin threes!
4=3--where are they teleporting from!!

ok here (you can only be anal if you know what your talking about)

It's a math induction proof

a + b = c is assumed
4a-3a+4b-3b=1a+1b but since we assumed above it = 1c which = 4c-3c\

4a-3a+4b-3b=4c-3c
now you add 3a and 3b to both sides. it cancels out on the left and is added to the right. You also subtract 4c from both sides, which cancels out on the right.

you get
4a+4b-4c=3a+3b-3c

now is you factor out the 4 and the 3 (BTW what math are you in ((if you're of the school age)), this is sequential 3/Math B stuff)

you get
4(a+b-c)=3(a+b-c)

now divide both sides by (a+b-c), they both cancel out.

you get
4=3

tahdah.

This sig is more trouble than it's worth[/quote]

Wrong again - its ok up until 4(a+b-c)=3(a+b-c)

since a+b=c this becomes 4(c-c)=3(c-c)

Making it 0=0

5h1|27_|\|1|\|j4 · Post by **5h1|27_|\|1|\|j4** » Wed Nov 19, 2003 7:30 pm

thread hijackers

Arina · Post by **Arina** » Sat Nov 22, 2003 8:04 am

And the topic now is so off topic, we pity the thread starter although this did get intresting

harpua7859 · Post by **harpua7859** » Fri Jan 23, 2004 1:16 pm

riiiiiiight

well yes. ok. agreed.

MaverickLlama · Post by **MaverickLlama** » Sat Jan 24, 2004 1:44 am

[quote="I like pie";p="208127"]well that's what it came out to at the end

Time is money, therefor Time = Money

Girls require time and money, or Money^2 (since time = money,)

So Girls = Money^2

and money is the root of all evil so

Girls = (Root Of Evil)^2

The root of a value squared is the value (squaring the root cancels it out)

So Girls = Evil

^^ the problem with that is this:

Girls require time and money, or Money^2 (since time = money,)

So Girls = Money^2

Girls = Time AND Money. "and" represents addition, not multiplication

so Girls = Time + Money, or Money + Money, not (Money)(Money) or Money^2. at best it can be represented as 2(Money) but even that throws off the whole equation

yeah I know i'm a big dork, but whenever anybody posts that stupid picture I feel obligated to be an ass and point out the flaw. Just like with StarDeath88's sig, which I've seen more commonly as a proof of 2 = 1.

It's just a bunch of flawed math.

^^stupid[/quote]

I know this was said a while ago, but before you even get to the math bit, the whole thing is thrown off by the fact that girls are not, in fact, evil. Granted they can be really, really exasperating and frustrating and causing a lot of pain, but they're not evil. Whoever made that picture in the first place was probably gay or something. (gay being meant as just homosexual, not implying evil, stupid, or otherwise effed up. Just a little disclaimer here.) Er, what was I saying? Oh yeah. Girls aren't evil. Some of them are, but they, as a group, aren't evil.

DarkWolfe · Post by **DarkWolfe** » Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:20 am

I liked it much better when this thread was about breasts...

Real Life Forums

Lena=Hot(for a cartoon chick)

Re: Lena=Hot(for a cartoon chick)

Re: Lena=Hot(for a cartoon chick)

Re: Lena=Hot(for a cartoon chick)

Re: Lena=Hot(for a cartoon chick)

Who is online